Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;70(2):790–797. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.790-797.2004

TABLE 3.

Camplylobacter detection in poultry flocks

Flock no. Direct quantitative detectiona,b
Direct qualitative detectiona,c
Enrichment detectiona,c
Presence of Campylo- bacterd
Feces Cecum Feces Cecum Feces Cecum
1 No
2 No
3 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
4 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
5 No
6 ++ +++ ++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
7 No
8 ++ +++ + +++ Yese
9 ++ +++ ++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
10 No
11 +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ Yes
12 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
13 +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ Yes
14 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Yes
15 +++ NT +++ NT +++ NT Yes
16 NT NT No
17 +++ +++ NT NT Yese
18 NT NT No
19 +++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
20 +++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
21 +++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
22 ++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
23 NT NT No
24 +++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
25 NT NT No
26 +++ +++ +++ +++ NT NT Yes
27 NT NT No
28 NT NT No
29 + + +++ +++ NT NT Yes
30 NT NT NT NT No
31 +++ +++ NT NT NT NT Yes
a

Percentage of samples containing Campylobacter, as follows: −, 0; +, ≤50; ++, 50 to 100; +++, 100; NT, not tested.

b

Detection of C. jejuni.

c

Detection of Campylobacter spp.

d

The flock was defined as Campylobacter positive if at least one of the samples gave a positive Campylobacter signal.

e

Flock contains Campylobacter species other than C. jejuni.