Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 11;15(4):391–402. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1021-4

Table 6.

Study characteristics—studies with consecutive inclusion in non-randomised studies with information about posterior instrumentation, decompression, and reduction

Study Study type N Average age (range) Grades included Levels included Type of treatment Follow-up Posterior instr. Decompression Reduction Clinical outcome Fusion Complications Cowley score
Knight [20] Prospective treatment series 24 42.2 (22–72) I–III L4–S1 Posterolateral endoscopic foraminal decompression 34 Months No Yes No 79% NR 2 Revisions 12
Verlooy [44] Prospective treatment series 20 42 (21–70) I L4–S1 PIF (IC) + laminectomy, DE 42 Months No Yes No 45% 80% 1 L5 paresis, 13 minor sensory disturbances 11
Suk [37] Retrospective controlled treatment series 40 44 (30–60) I–III L3–S1 PLF (steffee/CDI/diapason) 5.4 Years Yes Yes Yes 95% 92.5% 6:3 Non-union, 2 instrument failure, 1 infection 7
Retrospective controlled treatment series 36 44 (30–60) I–III L3–S1 PLF (VSP/diapason) + PIF (IC) 3.3 years Yes Yes Yes 98% 100% 2:1 Infection, 1 neurology
Markwalder [23] Prospective patient cohort 72 40 (15–65) I–III L4–S1 PLF (Lois plates/CDI) 26 Months Yes No Yes 96% 100% 12 Removal of material 5
Kim [19] Retrospective controlled patient cohort 20 44.1 (21–62) I–II L3–S1 AIF 3.6 Years No Yes No 85% 90% 7:2 Warm leg, 2 paralytic ileus, 1 urinary retention, 2 delayed union 5
Retrospective controlled patient cohort 20 41.3 (21–57) I–II L3–S1 PLF (PS + blockbone) 2.3 Years Yes No No 90% 95% 1:Screw loosening

CDI Cottrell–Dubousset instrumentation; IC iliac crest autograft, PIF posterior interbody fusion, AIF anterior interbody fusion, NR not reported, PLF posterolateral fusion, DE discectomy