TABLE 5.
Phage typing comparisons among four sets of LT7 sibling strainsa
| Allele | Strain | Phage type
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Felix and Callow/Lilleengen | Anderson DT | ||
| met-121 | 1999 | 1b var. 2/2 | 4 |
| 2029 | Serologically rough 01 +b | UT | |
| 2024 | Serologically rough 01 Φc | UT | |
| met-143 | 2038 | 1b var. 2/7 | 4 |
| 2040 | 1b var. 2/7 | 4 | |
| 2036 | Serologically rough 01 + | UT | |
| 2025 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | UT | |
| 2022 | UT rough 01 + | UT | |
| ser-85 | 2041 | 1b var. 2/7 | 4 |
| 2034 | 2b/NCd | RDNC (1)e | |
| 1988 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | UT | |
| 1998 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | UT | |
| 2033 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | UT | |
| ser-92 | 2043 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | UT |
| 2026 | Serologically rough 01 Φ | 120 | |
a
Each set of sibling strains was stored from a single isolate nearly 40 years ago.
b
Reacts with phage 01.
c
Does not react with phage 01.
d
NC, noncharacteristic of a Lilleengen phage type.
e
Reaction does not conform to a known Anderson phage type but falls in group 1.