Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 7;15(6):864–875. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0939-x

Table 1.

Summary of evaluated cases in follow-up

Case Age/sex Frankel adm. Diagnosis Instr. L Fus. L Non fus. L LBOS Frankel foll.
1 35/m E A3 L1/A1 L2 T12-L2 T12-L1 L1-L2 (1) 71/ E E
2 28/f E B2 T12 T11-L1 N T11-L1 (2) 70/E E
3 20/m E B2 L1/ A1 L2 T12-L2 N T12-L2 (2) 48/R E
4 25/m E B2 L1 T12-L2 N T12-L2 (2) 20/P E
5 27/m E B1T11-T12 T11-L1 T11-T12 T12-L1 (1) 71/E E
6 31/m E B1 T12-L1/ A3 L3 T12-L3 T12-L2 L2-L3 (1) 74/E E
7 35/m E A3 L1 T12-L2 T12-L1 L1-L2 (1) 75/E E
8 22/m E B2 L1 T12-L2 N T12-L2 (2) 71/E E
9 44/m E A2 L2 L1-L3 N L1-L3 (2) 75/E E
10 21/m E A3 L2 L1-L3 N L1-L3 (2) 70/E E
11 26/m D B2 T12/ A1L2 T11-L1 N T12-L2 (2) 69/E E
12 59/m D B1 T12-L1 T12-L2 T12-L1 L1-L2 (1) 67/E E
13 39/m C A3 L1/A1 L3 T12-L4 L2-L4 T12-L2 (2) 55/B D
14 48/m E C1 T11-T12 T11-L1 T11-T12 T12-L1 (1) 63/B E
15 49/m E A3 L1 T12-L2 T12-L1 L1-L2 (1) 70/E E
16 41/m E A3 L2 L1-L3 L1-L2 L2-L3 (1) 75/E E
17 19/m E B2 T12 T11-L1 N T11-L1 (2) 55/B E
18 23/m E B1 L2-L3 L2-L4 L2-L3 L3-L4 (1) 64/B E
19 28/m E A2 L1 T12-L2 L1-L2 T12-L1 (1) 60/B E

instr L Instrumented levels, Fus. L Fused levels, Non fus L Non fused levels

Frank Frankel admisión and follow up

LBOS Low back outcome score. Excellent, good, fair and poor.