Table 3.
Inter-rater reliability of ratings across three independent observers
Rating Scale domains | Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) | Significance (p) |
---|---|---|
THE TEAM |
|
|
Attendance |
n/a – rating based on in-vivo factual information |
|
Leadership: chairing of the meeting |
0.58 (−0.37 to 0.90) |
0.07 |
Teamworking & culture: |
|
|
a) Inclusion of all relevant team members |
0.68 (0.07 to 0.92) |
0.02 |
b) Team sociability |
0.52 (−0.56 to 0.89) |
0.10 |
c) Mutual respect between participants |
0.72 (0.21 to 0.93) |
0.01 |
d) Tension/conflict |
0.10 (−0.92 to 0.73) |
0.40 |
Personal development and training |
0.74 (0.23 to 0.93) |
0.01 |
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MEETINGS |
|
|
Meeting venue |
0.92 (0.76 to 0.98) |
<0.001 |
Technology & equipment |
0.92 (0.76 to 0.98) |
<0.001 |
MEETING ORGANISATION AND LOGISTICS |
|
|
Preparation prior to meetings: a) agenda |
0.55 (−0.13 to 0.87) |
0.04 |
b) prioritisation of complex cases |
n/a rated by one observer only |
|
Organisation/admin during meetings: a) patient notes |
0.47 (−0.27 to 0.85) |
0.07 |
b) case presentation |
0.74 (0.16 to 0.94) |
0.01 |
CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS |
|
|
Patient-centred care |
0.77 (0.24 to 0.95) |
0.01 |
Treatment Plan | 0.32 (−0.84 to 0.83) | 0.23 |