Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 26;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-119

Table 1.

Coping-Together study outcomes and measures

Outcomes Measures and Psychometrics
Primary Outcome
Anxiety
7-item HADS-Anxiety Subscale (patients and partners) [69] (α = .68-.93) [70]
Secondary Outcomes
Depression
7-item HADS-Depression Subscale (patients and partners) [69] (α = .67-.90) [70]
Cancer distress
15-item Revised Impact of Event Scale (patients and partners; α = .78-.96) [71]
Quality of Life (QOL)
35-item Assessment of Quality of Life – 8 Dimensions Scale (AQoL-8D; patients and partners) [72]
 
35-item Caregiver’s QOL Index-Cancer (partners) [73]
Relationship satisfaction
7-item Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale (patients and partners) [74] α = .89-.95) [75]
Appraisal
28-item Kessler Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale (patients and partners [adapted]; α > .70) [76]
 
33-item Mishel’s Uncertainty Scale (patients and partners; α = .64-0.91) [77]
 
27-item Appraisal of Caregiving Scale (partners; α > .85) [78,79]
Self-efficacy
17-item Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale (patients and partners; α = .97) [78]
 
12-item Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy Scale for Cancer (CASE-Cancer; patients and partners [adapted]; α = .76-.77) [80]
Dyadic coping
37-item Dyadic Coping Inventory (patients and partners; α = .63-.84) [81]
Individual Coping
28-item Brief COPE measures 14 individual-level coping strategies (patients and partners; α = .60-.90) [82]
Moderators*
Information obtained and information-seeking preferences
25-item EORTC Quality of Life (QOL) – information module (patients and partners; α > 0.70) [83]
 
45-item Profile of Preferences for Cancer Information (PPCI) (patients and partners [adapted]) [84]
Readiness for self-directed learning
39-item adapted version of the Learning Preference Scale (patients and partners [adapted]) [85]
Problems experienced 48-item adapted version of SupportScreen scale (patients and partners [adapted]) [86]

Note. Brackets indicate if patients and/or partners will complete the measure. * Questionnaires measuring potential moderators were included in the survey to reflect those that would be included in a survey for a larger trial to comprehensively examine the feasibility of the methods. However, the pilot is underpowered and moderators will not be analysed.