Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2012 Sep 15;226:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.049

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The best three of logistic regression analysis in the ISO (A,C,E) and the HALO (B,D,F) subgroups using two explanatory variables. Open circles represent animals with cortical infarct size larger than 80 mm3 (ci), and the triangles designate animals with negligible, cortical infarcts (no) in all panels (A–F). The solid line discriminates “ci” and “no” according to the logistic regression. For example, in panel B all animals above the solid line were predicted as “ci”, and all animals below it were predicted as “no”. However, two triangles are above the solid line and one open circle is below it, thus CPA=20/23. The dashed lines represent the borders, beyond which the model will predict with at least 95% certainty, for the “ci” and the “no” animals, and if those limits are broad the dashed line may not be shown. If the regression analysis is “too good”, i.e. there are not enough incorrectly predicted animals, no robust probabilities for a correct prediction can be calculated (it is about 100%), thus no dashed line is given (Panel A). The CPA is indicated in the upper right corner of each panel.