Table 2.
Results of exploratory factor analysis
| Item labels | Hospital | Community | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | |
| Reception | .809 | .227 | .806 | .365 |
| People | .796 | .276 | .829 | .321 |
| Leadership | .771 | .362 | .742 | .415 |
| Organisation | .756 | .440 | .811 | .388 |
| Facilities | .742 | .276 | .821 | .209 |
| Real patient access | .500 | .613 | .822 | .347 |
| Inspiration | .694 | .526 | .637 | .543 |
| Observation | .263 | .914 | .322 | .880 |
| Feedback | .262 | .854 | .316 | .881 |
| Instruction | .428 | .825 | .369 | .847 |
| Clinical teaching | .627 | .652 | .665 | .594 |
Values are shown in bold when the loading on factors 1 and 2 did not differ by >0.2. Items are marked in italics to indicate the factor onto which they loaded more heavily. The item previously named ‘learning environment’ has been renamed ‘facilities’ to avoid confusion