Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;14(3):605–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02600.x

Table 3.

The fates of ingested DMSP in A. carterae during predation by mixotrophic K. veneficum, determined using dilution experiments.

DMSP/DMS/other compounds (nmol l−1 day−1) Dilution Exp. 1 Dilution Exp. 2 Dilution Exp. 3 Dilution Exp. 4
Grazed DMSP 119.6 ± 9.1a 286.6 ± 16.1 732.6 ± 53.5 528.0 ± 28.0
Retained DMSP 39.5 ± 9.9 139.6 ± 32.7 322.4 ± 36.6 281.4 ± 82.4
(33.0%)b (48.7%) (44.0%) (53.3%)
Grazing-mediated DMS production 7.3 ± 1.5 32.2 ± 1.0 35.8 ± 3.4 29.0 ± 0.6
(6.1%)c (11.3%) (4.9%) (5.5%)
Net dissolved DMSP production 2.3 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 2.0 10.5 ± 2.2 6.3 ± 1.1
(< 1.9%)d (< 2.5%) (< 1.4%) (< 1.2%)
Other compoundse ∼70.5f ∼107.6 ∼363.9 ∼211.3
(60.9%) (37.5%) (49.7%) (40.0%)
a

One standard deviation from replicate measurements.

b

Percentage of retained DMSP relative to the total DMSP grazed.

c

Percentage of grazing-mediated DMS production relative to the total DMSP grazed.

d

Percentage of net dissolved DMSP production relative to the total DMSP grazed.

e

Includes assimilation into other biochemical compounds within the predator cell, and transformation into other compounds via bacterial demethylation or oxidation processes.

f

Percentage of other compounds (e.g. methionine, DMSO and SO42−) relative to the total DMSP grazed.