Table 2.

Comparison of relative students’ success in both models of teaching

	Number (%) of students
Chest compression variable	4-stage approach (N = 62)	2-stage approach (N = 64)	P value
Correct chest compression depth	28 (45)	35 (55)	0.138
Correct chest compression rate	26 (42)	17 (26)	0.147*
Chest compression rate >120 min-1	34 (55)	47 (74)	0.090*
Chest compression rate <90min-1	2 (3)	0	0.148†
Correct hand placement	40 (65)	43 (67)	0.752*
Correct depth, rate, and hand placement for the same student	9 (15)	8 (13)	0.741*

*χ² test.

†Fisher exact test.