Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;102(10):1886–1892. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300902

TABLE 1—

Means and Standard Deviations of Subgroups: Supporting Positive Paternal Engagement Through Coparenting Counseling, 2004–2007

YPP (n = 40)
Control Group (n = 44)
Noncompleters (n = 7)
Significant Group Differences
Male, % or Mean (SD) Female, % or Mean (SD) Male, % or Mean (SD) Female, % or Mean (SD) Male, % or Mean (SD) Female, % or Mean (SD) YPP vs Control Female vs Male
Age, y 18.4 (2.1) 16.6 (1.2) 18.7 (1.9) 16.4 (1.0) 18.7 (2.4) 16.4 (1.1) Female < male**
Race/ethnicity
 White 35 50 52 54 25 40
 Latino 50 45 37 39 61 57
 Other 15 5 11 7 4 3
CIB scores T1 23.9 (4.91) 26.0 (5.65) 24.3 (4.68) 26.0 (6.22) 24.5 (4.82) 26.3 (6.11) Female > male**
CIB scores T2 24.5 (6.58) 29.2 (8.28) 22.0 (6.62) 25.8 (10.16) 22.8 (7.12) 23.2 (98.12) YPP > control**
QRI scores at T3 20.5 (7.29) 26.5 (6.48) 16.6 (9.15) 26.4 (5.20) 20.8 (7.1) 25.9 (6.0) Male-YPP > male-control**
PBC nurturing scores at T3 20.5 (7.29) 26.5 (6.48) 16.6 (9.15) 26.4 (5.20) 20.8 (7.1) 25.9 (6.0) Male-YPP > male-control** Female > male*
CAPI scores at T3 149.7 (91.79) 132.3 (70.91) 152.5 (82.90) 158.3 (78.56) 162.6 (82.1) 162.0 (90.2)

Note. CAPI = Child Abuse Potential Inventory; CIB = Capacity for Interpersonal Bonding; PBC = Parenting Behavior Checklist; QRI = Quality of Relationship Inventory; T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; YPP = Young Parenthood Program.

*P < .05; **P < .01.