Table 3.
Variable | Tijuana (n = 284) | Ciudad Juarez (n = 300) | Total (n = 584) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sociodemographics | ||||
Age (years) |
34(28,41) |
33(27,39) |
33(27,40) |
.11 |
# of years of education completed |
8(6,10) |
6(4,8) |
6(5,9) |
<.001 |
Speaks English |
118(41.5%) |
39(13.0%) |
157(26.9%) |
<.001 |
Has a spouse or steady partner |
107(37.7%) |
118(39.3%) |
225(38.5%) |
.68 |
Earns average of > = 350 USD** |
96(34.3%) |
180(60.0%) |
276(47.6%) |
<.001 |
# years lived in the city of interview |
16(8,29) |
26(18,34) |
22(10,33) |
<.001 |
Injection Drug Use History and Risks | ||||
Age when first injected drugs |
20(17,24) |
20(17,27) |
20(17,26) |
.47 |
Injected > = once per day** |
275(96.8%) |
274(91.3%) |
549(94.0%) |
.005 |
Obtained syringes from needle exchange** |
26(9.2%) |
34(11.3%) |
60(10.3%) |
.39 |
Syringe confiscated by police in exchange for not being arrested** |
78(27.7%) |
85(28.3%) |
163(28.0%) |
.86 |
Often/always injected drugs with a client** |
134(47.3%) |
52(17.3%) |
186(31.9%) |
<.001 |
Receptive needle sharing** |
271(95.8%) |
290(96.7%) |
561(96.2%) |
.57 |
Divided drugs with used syringe** |
178(63.3%) |
222(74.0%) |
400(68.8%) |
.006 |
Used a cooker after someone else had used it** |
274(97.2%) |
287(95.7%) |
561(96.4%) |
.33 |
Used a cotton filter after someone else had used it** |
256(90.5%) |
257(85.7%) |
513(88.0%) |
.08 |
Shared rinse water |
266(94.7%) |
283(94.3%) |
549(94.5%) |
.86 |
Injection Risk Index Score |
3.6(2.4,4.2) |
3.2(2.4,4.0) |
3.6(2.4,4.2) |
.00 |
Self-efficacy score for safer drug injection |
2.0(2.0,2.8) |
2.0(1.8,2.7) |
2.0(1.8,2.7) |
<.001 |
Sex Work History and Risks | ||||
Age when began to work regularly as a FSW |
20(17,25) |
19(16,25) |
19(16,25) |
.02 |
# Unprotected vaginal/anal sex acts with spouse/steady partner** |
9(2,30) |
10(4,30) |
9(3,30) |
.42 |
Income earned from sex (USD)** |
770( 305,1500) |
1140( 540,1896) |
960( 420,1800) |
<.001 |
# male clients** |
15(6,30) |
68(30,104) |
30(10,80) |
<.001 |
# vaginal/anal sex acts with clients** |
34(12,60) |
84(40,127) |
51(20,101) |
<.001 |
# unprotected vaginal or anal sex acts with clients** |
25(5,56) |
33(12,65) |
30(9,60) |
<.001 |
Self-efficacy for condom use score |
3.0( 2.6,3.0) |
3.0( 2.6,3.0) |
3.0( 2.6,3.0) |
.82 |
Amount earned per vaginal sex act without condom (USD) |
25(20,35) |
15(10,20) |
20(15,30) |
<.001 |
Arrested in the past 6 months |
115(40.9%) |
147(49.0%) |
262(45.1%) |
.05 |
HIV/STI Services and Laboratory Test Results | ||||
Ever had an HIV test |
144(50.9%) |
148(49.3%) |
292(50.1%) |
.71 |
Has seen more access to condoms* |
113(42.2%) |
52(17.3%) |
165(29.0%) |
<.001 |
Has seen more access to sterile syringes* |
116(43.0%) |
48(16.1%) |
164(28.8%) |
<.001 |
Reports ‘easy access’ to sterile syringes |
238(88.5%) |
210(70.7%) |
448(79.2%) |
<.001 |
Tested positive for syphilis |
46(16.2%) |
96(32.7%) |
142(24.6%) |
<.001 |
Syphilis titers > =1:8, among lifetime syphilis cases |
23(50.0%) |
26(26.8%) |
49(34.3%) |
.006 |
Tested positive for gonorrhea |
5(1.8%) |
8(2.7%) |
13(2.2%) |
.46 |
Tested positive for Chlamydia |
28(9.9%) |
42(14.0%) |
70(12.0%) |
.12 |
Tested positive for trichomonas |
102(35.9%) |
94(31.3%) |
196(33.6%) |
.24 |
Tested positive for bacterial vaginosis | 70(24.6%) | 158(52.7%) | 228(39.0%) | <.001 |
*past year; **past month.
*** Calculated based on methods used in the DUIT intervention [38], comprised of the following: receptive needle sharing, sharing a cooker, cotton filter, or rinse water to prepare drugs for injection after someone else had used it, and using a used syringe to divide drugs. The score was constructed by calculating the average between the responses to these five injection risk indicators (1 = never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = about half the time, 4 = often, and 5 = always), with higher scores representing higher risk.
**** Numbers associated with the continuous variables represent Medians and Interquartile Ranges.