Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 14;12:653. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-653

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of Mujer Mas Segura participants by location: Tijuana (n = 284) versus Ciudad Juarez (n = 300)

Variable Tijuana (n = 284) Ciudad Juarez (n = 300) Total (n = 584) p
Sociodemographics
Age (years)
34(28,41)
33(27,39)
33(27,40)
.11
# of years of education completed
8(6,10)
6(4,8)
6(5,9)
<.001
Speaks English
118(41.5%)
39(13.0%)
157(26.9%)
<.001
Has a spouse or steady partner
107(37.7%)
118(39.3%)
225(38.5%)
.68
Earns average of > = 350 USD**
96(34.3%)
180(60.0%)
276(47.6%)
<.001
# years lived in the city of interview
16(8,29)
26(18,34)
22(10,33)
<.001
Injection Drug Use History and Risks
Age when first injected drugs
20(17,24)
20(17,27)
20(17,26)
.47
Injected > = once per day**
275(96.8%)
274(91.3%)
549(94.0%)
.005
Obtained syringes from needle exchange**
26(9.2%)
34(11.3%)
60(10.3%)
.39
Syringe confiscated by police in exchange for not being arrested**
78(27.7%)
85(28.3%)
163(28.0%)
.86
Often/always injected drugs with a client**
134(47.3%)
52(17.3%)
186(31.9%)
<.001
Receptive needle sharing**
271(95.8%)
290(96.7%)
561(96.2%)
.57
Divided drugs with used syringe**
178(63.3%)
222(74.0%)
400(68.8%)
.006
Used a cooker after someone else had used it**
274(97.2%)
287(95.7%)
561(96.4%)
.33
Used a cotton filter after someone else had used it**
256(90.5%)
257(85.7%)
513(88.0%)
.08
Shared rinse water
266(94.7%)
283(94.3%)
549(94.5%)
.86
Injection Risk Index Score
3.6(2.4,4.2)
3.2(2.4,4.0)
3.6(2.4,4.2)
.00
Self-efficacy score for safer drug injection
2.0(2.0,2.8)
2.0(1.8,2.7)
2.0(1.8,2.7)
<.001
Sex Work History and Risks
Age when began to work regularly as a FSW
20(17,25)
19(16,25)
19(16,25)
.02
# Unprotected vaginal/anal sex acts with spouse/steady partner**
9(2,30)
10(4,30)
9(3,30)
.42
Income earned from sex (USD)**
770( 305,1500)
1140( 540,1896)
960( 420,1800)
<.001
# male clients**
15(6,30)
68(30,104)
30(10,80)
<.001
# vaginal/anal sex acts with clients**
34(12,60)
84(40,127)
51(20,101)
<.001
# unprotected vaginal or anal sex acts with clients**
25(5,56)
33(12,65)
30(9,60)
<.001
Self-efficacy for condom use score
3.0( 2.6,3.0)
3.0( 2.6,3.0)
3.0( 2.6,3.0)
.82
Amount earned per vaginal sex act without condom (USD)
25(20,35)
15(10,20)
20(15,30)
<.001
Arrested in the past 6 months
115(40.9%)
147(49.0%)
262(45.1%)
.05
HIV/STI Services and Laboratory Test Results
Ever had an HIV test
144(50.9%)
148(49.3%)
292(50.1%)
.71
Has seen more access to condoms*
113(42.2%)
52(17.3%)
165(29.0%)
<.001
Has seen more access to sterile syringes*
116(43.0%)
48(16.1%)
164(28.8%)
<.001
Reports ‘easy access’ to sterile syringes
238(88.5%)
210(70.7%)
448(79.2%)
<.001
Tested positive for syphilis
46(16.2%)
96(32.7%)
142(24.6%)
<.001
Syphilis titers > =1:8, among lifetime syphilis cases
23(50.0%)
26(26.8%)
49(34.3%)
.006
Tested positive for gonorrhea
5(1.8%)
8(2.7%)
13(2.2%)
.46
Tested positive for Chlamydia
28(9.9%)
42(14.0%)
70(12.0%)
.12
Tested positive for trichomonas
102(35.9%)
94(31.3%)
196(33.6%)
.24
Tested positive for bacterial vaginosis 70(24.6%) 158(52.7%) 228(39.0%) <.001

*past year; **past month.

*** Calculated based on methods used in the DUIT intervention [38], comprised of the following: receptive needle sharing, sharing a cooker, cotton filter, or rinse water to prepare drugs for injection after someone else had used it, and using a used syringe to divide drugs. The score was constructed by calculating the average between the responses to these five injection risk indicators (1 = never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = about half the time, 4 = often, and 5 = always), with higher scores representing higher risk.

**** Numbers associated with the continuous variables represent Medians and Interquartile Ranges.