Table 2. Estimates of reproductive parameters and the demographic effective inbreeding number of breeders (
) for four populations of O. reticulata and its comparison to census population size (
).
Frag | Year |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
ORF1 | 1990 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 55 | 20 | 58 | 0.6 |
ORF1 | 2000 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 50 | 24 | 65 | 0.6 |
ORF3 | 1990 | 0.36* | 0.45* | 0.48* | 0.56* | 1 | –** | –** | –** |
ORF3 | 2000 | 0.36* | 0.45* | 0.48* | 0.56* | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0.1 |
ORF7 | 1990 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 0.3 |
ORF7 | 2000 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 27 | 31 | 58 | 1.1 |
ORF8 | 1990 | 0.36* | 0.45* | 0.48* | 0.56* | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.5 |
ORF8 | 2000 | 0.36* | 0.45* | 0.48* | 0.56* | 25 | 23 | 48 | 0.5 |
and
are the estimated corrected mean number of juveniles produced by female and male potential breeders and
and
are the estimated corrected inter-individual variances (see methods).
and
are the inbreeding effective number of females and males.*: estimates based on the weighted mean from four populations (see methods). **: no estimates possible due to few numbers of offspring.