Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jun 7;37(1):40–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01837.x

Table 4.

Three-Condition Visual Target Detection Task: ERP outcome data

Outcome
Group
Effect size (partial η2)
NSAC
TNAD
NSAC vs. TNAD Girls vs. Boys Group* Gender
Girls Boys Girls Boys



P3a (n = 36) (n = 24) (n = 27) (n = 12)
 Latency 403.11 (43.06) 402.83 (47.76) 409.78 (42.63) 379.00 (36.55) 0.9 2.8 2.7
 Amplitude 11.78 (4.29) 12.89 (4.59) 11.35 (4.01) 14.41 (3.52) 0.4 5.2* 1.2
P3b (n = 37) (n = 24) (n = 29) (n = 14)
 Latency 389.19 (51.29) 384.33 (31.45) 388.83 (34.70) 382.29 (24.69) 0.1 0.5 0.1
 Amplitude 18.70 (6.40) 19.08 (5.55) 17.90 (6.93) 23.41 (7.13) 1.6 4.6* 3.5

Note. Means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. Latency data are presented in ms. Amplitude data are presented in μV. NSAC = non-substance-abusing control group; TNAD = treatment-naïve alcohol dependent group.

*

p < .05.