Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2012 May 14;69(2):444–455. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24282

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7

The top row compares a fully sampled Cartesian image (384 × 384) with 256-spoke radial and O-Space images each reconstructed to 512 × 512. In subsequent rows, images are reconstructed from 4-fold and 8-fold undersampling of the datasets (64 and 32 spokes, respectively). FOV = 10 cm, TR = 750 ms, TE = 9 ms, 1 average.