Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 10;22(12):2715–2732. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr295

Table 3.

Average complexity values for stimulus pairs

Stimulus type Average complexity of all pairs Average complexity of least complex pairs Average complexity of most complex pairs
Amharic strings 33.53 27.78 39.15
Consonant strings 20.4 17.0 23.7
Nonwords 20.2 15.95 24.05
Pseudowords 20.2 16.45 23.9
Words 20.2 16.35 24.5

Note: Complexity for each pair was computed as the summed value of brushstrokes/character (Changizi and Shimojo 2005) for all 8 characters in each pair. The 20 pairs with the highest complexity values for each stimulus type were labeled “most complex” and the 20 pairs with the lowest complexity values for each stimulus type were labeled “least complex.”