Table 5.

Regions showing a pair type by stimulus type by timecourse interaction

Anatomical location	MNI coordinates			3-Way interaction P value	Amharic	Consonant	Nonwords	Pseudowords	Words
	x	y	z
L fusiform	−44	−67	−4	0.0013	H = S > E	S > H > E	ns	H > S = E	H > S = E
R fusiform	41	−84	10	0.022	S > H = E	S > H > E	ns	ns	H = S > E
R parietal	33	−58	53	0.00149	H = S > E	H = S > E	H = S > E	H > S = E	H > S > E
L occipital	−30	−93	19	0.034	S > E	S > H > E	ns	H > S = E	H > E
L parietal	−28	−62	50	0.0000449	H > E = S	ns	H > S > E	H > S = E	H > S = E
Anterior cingulate	−3	15	52	0.021	H = S > E	H = S > E	H = S > E	H > S = E	H > E
R precentral gyrus	42	6	33	0.033	H = S > E	H > S > E	ns	H > S = E	H = S > E
L lateral parietal	−43	−60	48	0.00059	H = S > E	ns	ns	H > E = S	H > S > E
L lateral parietal	−47	−48	49	0.000198	H = E > S	H = E > S	H > S > E	H > E = S	H > E = S
L precentral gyrus	−44	3	35	0.000119	ns	H = S > E	H > S = E	H > S = E	H > S > E
L frontal	−46	32	20	0.0215	ns	ns	ns	H > S = E	H > S = E

Note: All regions from the pair type by timecourse analysis showing a 3-way pair type by stimulus type by timecourse interaction. The pattern of statistically significant effects is shown for each stimulus type. The left OT region detailed in Figure 7 is shown in the top row. L, left; R, right; S, same pairs; H, hard/2-character different pairs; E, easy/4-character different pairs; ns, nonsignificant.