Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Jun 9;59(7):1829–1838. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2159115

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Summary of EMG prediction and stability rates (R2 ± S EM) with the Wiener cascade filter and SCKF (eq. (15)) for the large-file dataset. The average R2 and their standard error of means for Dataset II are reported. Wiener cascade filter and SCKF results were comparable when large training data was used. Only when the bin sizes were 10 ms and 20 ms the difference in prediction rates were statistically significant, shown with asterisk.