Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 18;63(4):1890–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.036

Table 2.

Simulation study: model-based and bootstrap results for correlation differences of .05 (.05, .10) and Fisher-z difference of .05. Results presented for Fisher-z difference between groups

Summary Statistics Pool GEE AR(1) Tran 3 Tran 2 Tran 1 Tran 1*
bias 0.168 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.124
MSE 0.0289 0.0014 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0164
Model-based
 E(SE) 0.027 0.037 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.031
 95% Cov 0 0.95 0.946 0.945 0.938 0.034
Bootstrap
 E(SE) 0.027 0.037 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.031
 95% cov 0 0.947 0.936 0.93 0.927 0.031

Note: Tran j is with j lag,

*

wrong function of time

95% coverages for bootstrap are bias-adjusted