Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 18;63(4):1890–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.036

Table 4.

Simulation study: model-based and bootstrap results for correlation differences of .30 (.05, .35) and Fisher-z difference of .32. Results presented for Fisher-z difference between groups

Summary Statistics Pool GEE AR(1) Tran 3 Tran 2 Tran 1 Tran 1*
bias 0.087 −0.001 −0.001 −0.001 −0.001 0.065
MSE 0.0083 0.0014 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0052
Model-based
 E(SE) 0.027 0.037 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.032
 95% Cov 0.117 0.947 0.938 0.937 0.937 0.451
Bootstrap
 E(SE) 0.027 0.037 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.031
 95% cov 0.131 0.945 0.935 0.935 0.932 0.45

Note: Tran j is with j lag,

*

wrong function of time

95% coverages for bootstrap are bias-adjusted