Skip to main content
. 1998 Jul;117(3):1047–1058. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.3.1047

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ADH specific activities in pericarp from Br, Br+2, and Br+7 fruit from transformed tomato plants. The top two histograms show results for plants transformed with the PJR-ADH construct containing the tomato Adh 2 cDNA coupled with the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter (left Br, right Br+7). The bottom two histograms show results from plants transformed with the PRD-ADH construct containing the tomato Adh 2 cDNA coupled with the tomato fruit-ripening-specific PG promoter (left Br+2, right Br+7). Results are arranged in order of increasing activity in Br+7 fruit and are indicated in the same order in the histograms on the left. Three fruit were averaged for each data point. Control in each histogram is a mean ± sd obtained from three fruit (each control point) from separate, untransformed plants. U, Units.