Table IV.

ADH activities and ratios of aldehydes:alcohols for populations of Br+7 T₀ and T₁ fruit

Plant	Inserts	Fruit Sampled	ADH Activity	Hexanal/ol	Hexenal/ol Z-3 + E-2/Z-3
	no.		units mg−1	relative abundance
Control AC1,2,3a		10	0.38  ± 0.15	49.2  ± 7.9	8.7  ± 1.3
C7 T0a	1	4	0.67  ± 0.16d	36.8  ± 10.7g	7.4  ± 1.2g
C14 T0a	1	3	0.56  ± 0.04e	23.4  ± 3.8f	5.2  ± 1.0e
C20 T0a	2	5	0.76  ± 0.15e	20.1  ± 4.7f	4.2  ± 1.1f
C13 T0a	6	3	1.26  ± 0.31d	25.2  ± 8.0d	4.8  ± 1.4d
C4 T0a	4	3	0.01  ± 0.016f	∞f	113  ± 75.5g
C11 T0a	8	4	0.006  ± 0.01f	235  ± 114d	∞f
C23 T0a	3	3	0.011  ± 0.02f	471  ± 126d	∞f
Control AC2b	0	4	0.230  ± 0.03	287  ± 75	103  ± 38
C7 T0b	1 (Hemizygous)	6	0.657  ± 0.05f	80  ± 4d	11  ± 1d
C7 T1b	1 (Hemizygous)	4	0.537  ± 0.11d	75  ± 13d	11  ± 3d
P41	1 (Hemizygous)	2	0.658  ± 0.11g	84  ± 11d	10  ± 1d
P31	2 (Homozygous)	6	0.672  ± 0.13f	70  ± 6d	11  ± 5d
P35	2 (Homozygous)	4	0.630  ± 0.14d	76  ± 15d	11  ± 6d
Control AC2b	0	4	0.230  ± 0.03	287  ± 75	103  ± 38
C14 T0b	1 (Hemizygous)	3	0.598  ± 0.10d	81  ± 1d	11  ± 1d
C14 T1b
P23	2 (Homozygous)	5	0.724  ± 0.45g	56  ± 14e	11  ± 6d
P35	2 (Homozygous)	4	0.510  ± 0.03f	69  ± 7d	9  ± 1d
Control AC2c	0	4	0.435  ± 0.03	192  ± 27	49  ± 10
C20 T0c	2 (Hemizygous)	6	0.722  ± 0.08f	114  ± 17e	20  ± 3d
C20 T1c
P16	2 (Hemizygous)	4	0.694  ± 0.05f	129  ± 32d	17  ± 4e
P33	2 (Hemizygous)	4	0.647  ± 0.11d	120  ± 13e	19  ± 2e
P45	2 (Hemizygous)	6	0.656  ± 0.05f	136  ± 18d	23  ± 4d
P18	2 (Hemizygous)cosuppressed	3	0.01  ± 0.01f	∞	404  ± 44e

Data sets were collected at different times. Each data set includes data for control fruit (AC) grown and harvested during the same period.

^aData collected June to August 1996. 

^bData collected July to September 1997. 

^cData collected February to March 1998. Within columns, comparisons were made between data for the transgenic fruit and the appropriate control fruit using Welch's t test. 

^dSignificant (P < 0.05). 

^eVery significant (P < 0.01). 

^fExtremely significant (P < 0.001). 

^gNot significant.