Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 7;7(11):e45896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045896

Table 2. Total average detection rates for the data shown in fig. 2.

data set A data set B
step detection method absolute detection rate [%] relative detection rate [%] absolute detection rate [%] relative detection rate [%]
MSF 65.4 119.9 83.6 131.3
Inline graphic 54.5 100.0 63.7 100.0

Filter settings were individually optimized for every noise amplitude and step width (data set A)/number of steps (data set B). Relative rates are related to the results obtained by the Inline graphic method combined with the windowed mean filter.