Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012 Dec;9(4):326–334. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0133-9

Table 1.

Study characteristics for technology based-interventions for people living with HIV included in the systematic review

Author, Year Journal Location Health Behavior Technology Intervention Sample Results
Aharonovich et al., 2012 In press, AIDS Care Drug Use I: Motivational Interviewing with daily brief patient calls C: Motivational Interviewing Only Non-injection drug users, HIV+ HealthCall was found to be feasible and acceptable; Between groups effect size of .062 favoring HealthCall arm
Brown et al., 2011 AIDS Care New York, USA Stress management I: Computer administered stress management intervention C: Delayed treatment HIV+ women; Intervention N=30; Control N=30 Improved stress management knowledge (p<.01); No significant differences in depressive symptoms, psychological distress, perceived stress and coping self-efficacy compared to control
da Costa et al., 2012 International Journal of Medical Informatics Brazil Medication adherence I: SMS text messages on alternating days 30 minutes before dose time C: Received no text messages HIV+ women; Intervention N=8; Control N=13 Adherence for the intervention condition was higher for self-report, pill counting and MEMS though not significantly
Dowshen et al., 2012 Journal of Medical Internet Research United States Medication adherence Pre-post design; Daily SMS reminders and interactive follow-up messages HIV+ youth (ages 14-29) N= 25 Daily SMS reminders for HIV+ youth were found to be feasible and acceptable. Adherence based on the Visual-Analog Scale was signficiant (d= 1.13, p<.001) as was self-reported recall (d=.73, p=.005). Viral load and CD4 cell count changes were not significant.
Fisher et al., 2011 AIDS and Behavior Connecticut, USA Medication adherence I: Interactive computer-based adherence intervention C: Standard of Care and general assessment HIV+ adults recruited from clinics; Intervention N= 290; Control N= 204 The intervention condition was significantly higher on perfect 3-day adherence measures. Significant differences were not found for decreases in viral load.
Gray et al., 2011 Journal of Health Psychology Southeastern United States Medication adherence Pre-post design; 7 alternating home and telephone sessions HIV+ adolescents N= 4 Estimated higher adherence during intervention; Positive and neutral trends in adherence across treatment; Decreased barriers to adherence for all participants.
Hardy et al., 2011 AIDS Patient Care and STDS Boston, Massachusetts, USA Medication adherence I: Personalized daily text messages C: Reminder beep at time of dosing HIV+ adults recruited from HIV clinic; Intervention N=10 Control N= 9 Adherence based on MEMS caps was significantly higher for the personalized text message condition (p=.002). Pill count and self-reported adherence measures were not significantly different.
Kalichman et al., 2011 AIDS Patient Care and STDS Atlanta, Georgia, USA Medication adherence I: 4 self-regulation counseling sessions over the phone C: Contact matched phone calls HIV+ adults; Intervention N= 21; Control N=19 Adherence based on unannounced pill counts was significantly higher for the intervention condition (effect sizes ranging from d= .45 to d= .80. Participants in the intervention condition also showed greater medication self-efficacy (effect sizes ranging from d=.33 to d=.65)
Lewis et al., 2012 In press, Health Psychology Medication adherence Text Message Self reported adherence significantly improved, viral load significantly decreased, CD4 count significantly increased
Pop-Eleches et al., 2011 AIDS Kenya Medication adherence C: No messages I1: Short daily text messages I2: Long daily text messages I3: short weekly text messages I4: long weekly text messages HIV+ adults initiating cART; Control N= 139; I1 N= 70; I2 N=72; I3 N=73; I4 N=74 Those receiving weekly text messages had significantly higher adherence averaged across all time points compared to the control. Weekly reminders also significantly reduced the frequency of treatment interruptions.
Uzma et al., 2011 Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (JIAPAC) Pakistan Medication adherence I: weekly phone reminders C: routine counseling HIV+ adults on first-line ART; Intervention N=38; Control N= 38 Those in the intervention condition had significantly better self-reported adherence (p<.001) and significantly lower viral load (p=.012).
Vidrine et al., 2011 Nicotine & Tobacco Research Houston, Texas, USA Smoking Cessation I: cell phone intervention C: usual care HIV+ adults who smoke more than 5 cigarettes a day; Intervention N= 236; Control N= 238 Those in the intervention condition had significantly higher smoking abstinence rates than those in the control condition (continuous abstinence p=.001).