Table 1.
Isolated acetabular revision
| Study | Number of revisions | Followup (years)* | Cup | HHS* | Dislocation | Aseptic loosening cup | Pelvic osteolysis | Survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamali et al. [14] | 95 | 10.8 (5–17.3) | NC | 81 (31–100) | 8% | 5 % | 4% | 90.5% at 10 years |
| Jones and Lachiewicz [15] | 69 | 6 (1–18) | NC | 83 (31–100) | 20% | 2% | 7% | 95% at 12 years |
| Poon and Lachiewicz [36] | 38 | 4 (2–10) | NC | 88 (NA) | 8% | 0% | NA | 95% at final followup |
| Lawless et al. [22] | 42 | 6.4 (2–13) | NC | 80 (40–99) | 0% | 7.3% | 2% | 88% at final followup |
| Della Valle et al. [7] | 55 | 3.6 (2–6.7) | C | NA | 16% | 0% | NA | NA |
| Khan et al. [17] | 34 | 3 (2.2–4.8) | C | 69 | 3% | 8.4% | NA | 88.2% at final followup |
| Current study | 33 | 3.3 (2–5) | DM | 86 (66–95) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 97% at 5 years |
* Ranges shown in parentheses; NC = Nonconstrained; C = Constrained; DM = Dual-mobility; HHS = Harris hip score; NA = not available.