Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;64(8):1108–1115. doi: 10.1002/acr.21663

Table 4.

Adjusted and unadjusted regression of 6-months EULAR response and patient-reported physical function*

Logistic regression of EULAR responders vs. nonresponders Ordinal regression of EULAR response Logistic regression of achieving 0.22-unit improvement in HAQ score
Therapy Unadjusted P Adjusted P Unadjusted P Adjusted P Unadjusted P Adjusted P
Anti-TNF (reference)
 RTX 1.35 (1.06, 1.71) 0.01 1.31 (1.02, 1.69) 0.04 1.34 (1.07, 1.68) 0.01 1.34 (1.05, 1.70) 0.02 1.48 (1.09, 2.01) 0.01 1.49 (1.07, 2.08) 0.02
*

Values are the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) unless indicated otherwise. EULAR = European League Against Rheumatism; HAQ = Health Assessment Questionnaire; anti-TNF = anti–tumor necrosis factor; RTX = rituximab.

Propensity score included Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, comorbidities, the failed anti-TNF therapy, and interaction between age and reason for switching.

Propensity score included age, comorbidities, the last failed anti-TNF therapy, interaction between disease duration and the reason for switching, using the logistic regression propensity score model.