Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 4;23(8):2146–2153. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr576

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of training and validation cohorts

Clinical and pathological characteristics
Training set Validation set
Patients (n = 28) Patients (n = 28)
Characteristics No. (%) No. (%) P value
Age
 Median (range) 62.5 (48–77) 63 (40–87) 0.902
Gradea
 1 11 (47.83) 10 (38.46) 0.925
 2 9 (39.13) 12 (46.15)
 3 3 (13.04) 4 (15.38)
Gender
 Male 26 (92.86) 26 (92.86) 0.681
 Female 2 (7.14) 2 (7.14)
Smoking
 Yes 23 (82.14) 26 (92.86) 0.197
 No 5 (17.86) 2 (7.14)
Alcohol consumption
 Yes 15 (53.5) 14 (50) 0.449
 No 13 (46.5) 14 (50)
Treatment modality
 Surgery 23 (82.1) 24 (85.7) 1.000
 Radiation therapy 5 (17.9) 4 (14.3)
Disease-free survival (months)
 Median (range) 48 (1–148) 59 (0–161) 0.376
Recurrence site
 Primary site 7 (25) 7 (25) 1.000
 Lymph nodes 2 (7.14) 1 (3.57)
 Distant site 0 (0) 0 (0)

Differences between patients of the training and validation sets were assessed using t-statistics for grade, gender, smoking status (defined as any smoking versus no smoking), treatment modality, recurrence site and alcohol consumption. Differences between patients of the training and validation sets were assessed using Mann–Whitney U test for age and disease-free survival. There was no statistically significant difference between training and validation sets in age, grade, gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, treatment modality used and recurrence site or disease-free survival.

aGrade was not available for seven patients.