Table 3.
Results of students responses to course evaluation questionnaire (in relation to module contents and faculty members) of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)
| Items of comparison | 2009/2010 Satisfaction N=129 % | 2010/2011 Satisfaction N=152 % | Test of significance |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Module contents | |||
| Objectives of course are clear |
69.5 |
93 |
P<0.001*** |
| Objectives of each teaching formats were explained at its start |
69 |
85 |
P=0.002** |
| The modules contents show relation between basic & clinical sciences |
81.1 |
89 |
P=0.089 |
| The practical part is related to the theoretical part |
67.4 |
87 |
P<0.001*** |
| This course help to develop my self-learning capacity |
63.3 |
86 |
P<0.001*** |
| PBL sessions improve my learning achievements |
61.7 |
80 |
P=0.001** |
| This course is good & useful for my future career |
80.9 |
94 |
P<0.001*** |
| Overall satisfaction |
70.5 |
87.5 |
P<0.01** |
|
Faculty members | |||
| address the contents of the module as stated study guide |
64 |
82 |
P=0.002** |
| encourage students to ask questions during teaching |
37.7 |
74 |
P<0.001*** |
| make good use of different types of educational methods |
46.1 |
73 |
P<0.001*** |
| Faculty members use clinical cases in teaching |
64.1 |
94 |
P<0.001*** |
| clearly explain the methods of assessment from the start of the course |
46.1 |
84 |
P<0.001*** |
| Faculty members provide positive feedback after each assessment |
34.2 |
70 |
P<0.001*** |
| encourage students for self-directed learning |
50.8 |
77 |
P<0.001*** |
| encourage students for electronic learning |
50.8 |
77 |
P<0.001*** |
| usually available in their office hours |
23.2 |
50 |
P<0.001*** |
| Overall satisfaction | 46.5 | 75.6 | P<0.001*** |