Table 4.
Results of students response to the course evaluation questionnaire (in relation to assessment and educational resources) of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)
| Items of comparison | 2009/2010 Satisfaction N=129 % | 2010/2011 Satisfaction N=152 % | Test of significance |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment | |||
| Assessment methods were fair |
41.7 |
75 |
P<0.001*** |
| Assessment reflects what was taught. |
43.6 |
84 |
P<0.001*** |
| Assessment method challenge students more than memorize. |
50 |
85 |
P<0.001*** |
| Number of tests was reasonable for the course. |
55.4 |
76 |
P=0.001** |
| These is Formative assessment |
37.9 |
75 |
P<0.001*** |
| The time of formative assessment is suitable. |
37.9 |
75 |
P<0.001*** |
| Overall satisfaction |
44.5 |
65.8 |
P<0.001*** |
|
Educational resources | |||
| Educational materials were available. |
66.7 |
67 |
P=0.96 |
| Educational materials posted of EMES MED (education management of electronic system for Medicine) at earlier time. |
39.3 |
50 |
P=0.084 |
| I frequently use the library to search learning material. |
39.3 |
69 |
P<0.001*** |
| The library contains adequate number of books for the course. |
45.3 |
72 |
P<0.001*** |
| Lecture rooms are well-equipped. |
45.3 |
62 |
P=0.006** |
| Laboratories are well-equipped |
53.2 |
64 |
P=0.084 |
| Rooms for PBL are well constructed |
53.2 |
51 |
P=0.81 |
| Student’s study guide helped me much throughout the course. |
35.5 |
59 |
P<0.001*** |
| Overall satisfaction | 54 | 61.7 | P=0.23 |