Table 7.

Results of course evaluation questionnaire by teaching faculty of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)

Items of comparison	2009/2010 Satisfaction Index	2010/2011 Satisfaction Index	Percentage of change
Integration is implemented during instruction	60	88	46
Learning objectives were made clear to students from the start	72	88	22
Learning objectives were made clear to faculty members from the start	70	80	17
Course encourages SDL	55	84	52
Course encourage group work	62	80	29
Course build students analytical and problem solving skills	55	84	52
PBL was successfully implemented as planned	60	92	53
Learning resources available helping in implementing the course objectives	45	88	95
Course web pages were relevant to course objectives	42	58	38
Number of staff members is sufficient in relation to tasks of the course	60	86	43
There is alignment between the course objectives, instruction and assessment	46	84	82
Assessment is based on a blueprint.	40	60	33
Various methods of assessment are used	55	70	30
Formative assessment without scores are used	60	84	38
Early feedback is provided to students	61	84	37
There is continuous and final summative assessment	70	90	28
The course team utilizes the results of interpretation of item analysis	55	82	49
Overall statistical index	53	80	51