Table 4.B. tabaci adult population across different V. mungo genotypes in multiple-choice test under screen-house conditions.
| Genotype | * Mean ± SEM adult whitefly population per trifoliate leaf |
Mean ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper canopy | Middle canopy | Lower canopy | ||
| KU 7-504 |
68.26 ± 2.77 |
69.53 ± 2.69 |
68.99 ± 2.91 |
68.93 ± 0.29 |
| KU 7-505 |
68.63 ± 2.66 |
69.09 ± 2.81 |
68.63 ± 2.79 |
68.78 ± 0.12 |
| KU 7-602 |
37.66 ± 2.86 |
37.76 ± 2.96 |
37.93 ± 9.26 |
37.78 ± 0.06 |
| KU 7-605 |
37.99 ± 2.99 |
37.86 ± 2.89 |
37.73 ± 2.97 |
37.86 ± 0.06 |
| KU 7-618 |
37.69 ± 2.85 |
38.52 ± 3.18 |
38.53 ± 2.89 |
38.25 ± 0.22 |
| KU 99-20 |
13.83 ± 0.78 |
13.62 ± 0.64 |
13.39 ± 0.71 |
13.61 ± 0.10 |
| IPU 02-043 |
40.33 ± 2.81 |
37.99 ± 2.79 |
38.43 ± 3.00 |
38.91 ± 0.58 |
| NDU 5-7 |
13.23 ± 0.68 |
13.26 ± 0.75 |
13.92 ± 0.65 |
13.47 ± 0.18 |
| Mash 1-1 | 51.96 ± 2.28 | 51.53 ± 2.38 | 52.02 ± 2.46 | 52.11 ± 0.14 |
*
Mean of five replications (each replication represents population at weekly interval). SEM, Standard error of mean.