Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 8;8(11):e1002767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002767

Table 4. Statistical comparison of the heterogeneous susceptibility model to the geometric infection model.

Inline graphic Inline graphic (95% CI) Inline graphic (95% CI) Inline graphic-value
Ellenberger06v −31.8 0.27 (0.13, 0.48) 0.019 (0, 0.094) 0.32
Wilson06jv −19.3 0.22 (0.11, 0.37) 0.000 (0, 0.031) 1.00
Wilson09jv −13.5 0.25 (0.11, 0.53) 0.000 (0, 0.123) 1.00
GarciaLerma08pm −41.6 0.26 (0.14, 0.46) 0.018 (0, 0.088) 0.32
Hansen09nm −30.0 0.27 (0.14, 0.5) 0.011 (0, 0.106) 0.67
Hansen11n −74.3 0.19 (0.11, 0.31) 0.007 (0, 0.043) 0.27
Letvin11stm.SIVmac251 −27.6 0.54 (0.35, 0.76) 0.019 (0, 0.11) 0.70
Letvin11stm.SIVsmE660 −96.0 0.23 (0.15, 0.34) 0.022 (3e−04, 0.065) 0.04 *

CI abbreviates confidence interval. The last column gives the Inline graphic-values for a likelihood ratio test, and significant tests are marked by *.