Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Imaging Med. 2012 Jun;4(3):299–310. doi: 10.2217/iim.12.20

Table 1.

A comparison between the various intracoronary imaging modalities discussed in this article.

Modality Resolution Penetration Contrast
mechanism
Pullback rate Flushing
IVUS 100–200 μm Whole artery Acoustic scattering 0.5 mm/s Not required
OCT/OFDI 20 μm 1–2 mm Optical scattering OCT: 1 mm/s
OFDI: 20–40 mm/s
Required
NIRF 250–1000 μm Whole artery Fluorescence 1 mm/s Not required
MSOT 100–200 μm Whole artery Optical absorption
spectrum
0.1 mm/min May not be required
in specific
wavelength bands
(e.g., the near-
infrared window)

The values in the table are typical for in vivo applications. For MSOT, the values are estimates based on state-of-the-art technology. The pullback rate was calculated for four wavelengths, a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz, 300 A-scans per slice and a step size of 200 μm.

IVUS: Intravascular ultrasound; MSOT: Multispectral optoacoustic tomography; NIRF: Near-infrared fluorescence; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; OFDI: Optical frequency domain imaging.