Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Oct 19;134(43):18132–18138. doi: 10.1021/ja308188z

Table 1.

X-ray Diffraction Data Collection and Refinementa

AfUGMo-NADPH AfUGMo-NADH AfUGMr
Data collection
Soaking ligand NADPH NADH NADPH
Soaking time (min.) 1 1 30
Flavin redox state oxidized oxidized reduced
Space group P6522 P6522 P6522
Unit cell parameters (Å) a =218.3, c = 319.2 a =218.3, c = 318.1 a = 217.4, c = 319.9
Wavelength (Å) 0.979 0.979 0.979
Resolution (Å) 163-2.75 (2.90-2.75) 162-2.75 (2.90-2.75) 50-2.20 (2.32-2.20)
Observations 851567 982507 984169
Unique reflections 116001 115207 222394
Rmerge(I)b 0.137 (0.885) 0.158 (1.216) 0.093 (0.673)
Rmeas(I)b 0.147 (0.967) 0.168 (1.297) 0.106 (0.778)
Rpim(I)b 0.054 (0.382) 0.054 (0.429) 0.049 (0.383)
Mean I/σ 11.6 (2.2) 10.9 (2.1) 9.8 (2.0)
Completeness (%) 99.9 (99.9) 99.6 (99.9) 99.7 (99.8)
Multiplicity 7.3 (6.1) 8.5 (7.9) 4.4 (4.0)

Refinement
Resolution (Å) 163-2.75 (2.78-2.75) 162-2.75 (2.78-2.75) 48-2.20 (2.28-2.20)
No. of protein residues 1987 1989 2017
No. of protein atoms 15008 15164 15526
No. of FAD atoms 212 212 212
No. of NAD(P)H molecules/atoms 4/158 2/88 0/0
NAD(P)H occupancyc 0.7–0.9 0.9 -
No. of water molecules 16 26 435
Rcryst 0.210 (0.299) 0.212 (0.404) 0.201 (0.293)
Rfreed 0.246 (0.318) 0.245 (0.391) 0.227 (0.343)
rmsd bond lengths (Å)e 0.008 0.008 0.007
rmsd bond angles (°)e 1.17 1.19 1.05
Ramachandran plotf
 Favored (no. residues) 1908 1919 1978
 Allowed (no. residues) 59 50 31
 Outliers (no. residues) 0 0 0
Average B-factor (Å2)
 Protein 53 51 41
 FAD 52 53 37
 NAD(P)Hc 48–72 50–52 -
 Water 36 41 37
Coordinate error (Å)g 0.41 0.51 0.36
PDB code 4gdc 4gdd 4gde
a

Values for the outer resolution shell of data are given in parenthesis.

b

Definitions of Rmerge, Rmeas, and Rpim can be found in Weiss.23

c

Range reflects the ligands bound to different chains of the tetramer.

d

A common set of test reflections (5 %) was used for refinement of all structures.

e

Compared to the parameters of Engh and Huber.24

f

The Ramachandran plot was generated with RAMPAGE.25

g

Maximum likelihood-based coordinate error estimate from PHENIX.