Table 1.
AfUGMo-NADPH | AfUGMo-NADH | AfUGMr | |
---|---|---|---|
Data collection
| |||
Soaking ligand | NADPH | NADH | NADPH |
Soaking time (min.) | 1 | 1 | 30 |
Flavin redox state | oxidized | oxidized | reduced |
Space group | P6522 | P6522 | P6522 |
Unit cell parameters (Å) | a =218.3, c = 319.2 | a =218.3, c = 318.1 | a = 217.4, c = 319.9 |
Wavelength (Å) | 0.979 | 0.979 | 0.979 |
Resolution (Å) | 163-2.75 (2.90-2.75) | 162-2.75 (2.90-2.75) | 50-2.20 (2.32-2.20) |
Observations | 851567 | 982507 | 984169 |
Unique reflections | 116001 | 115207 | 222394 |
Rmerge(I)b | 0.137 (0.885) | 0.158 (1.216) | 0.093 (0.673) |
Rmeas(I)b | 0.147 (0.967) | 0.168 (1.297) | 0.106 (0.778) |
Rpim(I)b | 0.054 (0.382) | 0.054 (0.429) | 0.049 (0.383) |
Mean I/σ | 11.6 (2.2) | 10.9 (2.1) | 9.8 (2.0) |
Completeness (%) | 99.9 (99.9) | 99.6 (99.9) | 99.7 (99.8) |
Multiplicity | 7.3 (6.1) | 8.5 (7.9) | 4.4 (4.0) |
| |||
Refinement
| |||
Resolution (Å) | 163-2.75 (2.78-2.75) | 162-2.75 (2.78-2.75) | 48-2.20 (2.28-2.20) |
No. of protein residues | 1987 | 1989 | 2017 |
No. of protein atoms | 15008 | 15164 | 15526 |
No. of FAD atoms | 212 | 212 | 212 |
No. of NAD(P)H molecules/atoms | 4/158 | 2/88 | 0/0 |
NAD(P)H occupancyc | 0.7–0.9 | 0.9 | - |
No. of water molecules | 16 | 26 | 435 |
Rcryst | 0.210 (0.299) | 0.212 (0.404) | 0.201 (0.293) |
Rfreed | 0.246 (0.318) | 0.245 (0.391) | 0.227 (0.343) |
rmsd bond lengths (Å)e | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
rmsd bond angles (°)e | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.05 |
Ramachandran plotf | |||
Favored (no. residues) | 1908 | 1919 | 1978 |
Allowed (no. residues) | 59 | 50 | 31 |
Outliers (no. residues) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Average B-factor (Å2) | |||
Protein | 53 | 51 | 41 |
FAD | 52 | 53 | 37 |
NAD(P)Hc | 48–72 | 50–52 | - |
Water | 36 | 41 | 37 |
Coordinate error (Å)g | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.36 |
PDB code | 4gdc | 4gdd | 4gde |
Values for the outer resolution shell of data are given in parenthesis.
Definitions of Rmerge, Rmeas, and Rpim can be found in Weiss.23
Range reflects the ligands bound to different chains of the tetramer.
A common set of test reflections (5 %) was used for refinement of all structures.
Compared to the parameters of Engh and Huber.24
The Ramachandran plot was generated with RAMPAGE.25
Maximum likelihood-based coordinate error estimate from PHENIX.