. 2012 Aug 25;125(8):1751–1765. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1951-2

Table 4.

Summary of QTL for FHB severity (AUDPC) identified by simple interval mapping

Pop	Chro	Flanking markers	Closest marker	Multienvironment analysis
Pop	Chro	Flanking markers	Closest marker	Add^a	% PV	LOD^b
FTd	3B	Xs25m12_f7h6–Xbarc147	Xbarc133	−62	5.3	10.7**
DTd	4B	Rht-B1–Xs11m14_d1h1	Rht-B1	51	3.1	6.4
FTd	4B	Rht-B1–Xs25m14_f9h7	Rht-B1	59	4.9	10.0**
HTd	4B	Xwmc617–Xs25m14_f9h7	Rht-B1	101	18.0	39.2***
DTd	6A	Xgwm132a–Xs20m15_d7	Xgwm356	62	4.0	8.3**
DTd	6B	Xwmc398–Xs23m14_d7	Xgwm816	45	2.4	4.9
FTd	6B	Xwmc398–Xgwm816	Xs24m25_f4	57	4.8	9.8**
FTd	7B	Xs24m26_d16f4–Xs24m12_f6h5	Xs24m12_f6h5	55	3.3	6.6
HTd	7B	Xgwm400–Xgwm46	Xs24m12_f6h5	38	2.2	4.7

Pop	Chro	Flanking markers	F. culmorum				F. graminearum
			2006		2008		2006		2008
			% PV	LOD^b	% PV	LOD^b	% PV	LOD^b	% PV	LOD^b
FTd	3B	Xs25m12_f7h6–Xbarc147	12.4	6.8***	4.5	2.2	5.2	2.7	9.4	4.7***
DTd	4B	Rht-B1–Xs11m14_d1h1	4.1	2.1	0.2	0.1	11.7	6.3***	8.9	4.7**
FTd	4B	Rht-B1–Xs25m14_f9h7	6.4	3.4	4.9	2.4	8.6	4.6*	9.7	4.8***
HTd	4B	Xwmc617–Xs25m14_f9h7	27.2	16.3***	20.2	11.6***	26.9	16.1***	16.6	9.3***
DTd	6A	Xgwm132a–Xs20m15_d7	3.1	1.6	10.4	5.5**	5.7	3.0*	5.3	2.7
DTd	6B	Xwmc398–Xs23m14_d7	1.3	0.7	5.8	3.0	3.5	1.8	6.2	3.2
FTd	6B	Xwmc398–Xgwm816	3.8	2.0	12.8	6.5**	3.8	2.0	8.7	4.3**
FTd	7B	Xs24m26_d16f4–Xs24m12_f6h5	0.2	0.1	19.5	10.2***	8.4	4.5**	0.3	0.1
HTd	7B	Xgwm400–Xgwm46	0.9	0.5	11.3	6.2**	2.7	1.4	1.3	0.7

LOD values ≥ 3 are printed in bold

* α 0.1 < LOD; ** α 0.05 < LOD; *** α 0.01 < LOD

^aPositive additive effects denote that the T.diccocum allele reduces trait values relative to its respective T. durum allele

^bSignificance thresholds were estimated by permutation tests (number of iterations = 1,000) for α 0.01, α 0.05, α 0.1 for each experiment and for the multienvironment analysis of all populations