Table 1.
Summary of the six mapping populations used to construct the consensus map of durum wheat
Parents | Population size | Markers | Total markers | Map length (cM) | Marker density (cM/marker) | Reference | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSR | EST-derived (SSR,STS) | DArT | Other markersa | ||||||
‘Creso’ × ‘Pedroso’ | 123 | 191 | 44 | 340 | – | 575 | 2,221.3 | 3.8 | Marone et al. (2009) |
‘Ofanto’ × ‘Cappelli’ | 161 | 154 | 23 | 437 | 4 | 618 | 1,649.4 | 2.6 | Verlotta et al. (2010) |
‘Cirillo’ × ‘Neodur’ | 178 | 71 | 7 | 212 | – | 290 | 1,568.5 | 5.4 | Russo et al. (2011) |
‘Ciccio’ × ‘Svevo’ | 120 | 132 | 110 | 584 | 4 | 830 | 1,765.8 | 2.1 | Gadaleta et al. (2009) |
‘Latino’ × ‘Primadur’ | 121 | 96 | 22 | 322 | – | 440 | 1,066.2 | 2.4 | Blanco et al. (2011, 2012) |
‘Messapia’ × ‘MG4343’ | 65 | 84 | – | – | 356 | 440 | 2,913.2 | 6.6 | Blanco et al. (2004) |
aRFLP, TRAP, biochemical and morphological markers