Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 8;125(8):1619–1638. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1939-y

Table 1.

Summary of the six mapping populations used to construct the consensus map of durum wheat

Parents Population size Markers Total markers Map length (cM) Marker density (cM/marker) Reference
SSR EST-derived (SSR,STS) DArT Other markersa
‘Creso’ × ‘Pedroso’ 123 191 44 340 575 2,221.3 3.8 Marone et al. (2009)
‘Ofanto’ × ‘Cappelli’ 161 154 23 437 4 618 1,649.4 2.6 Verlotta et al. (2010)
‘Cirillo’ × ‘Neodur’ 178 71 7 212 290 1,568.5 5.4 Russo et al. (2011)
‘Ciccio’ × ‘Svevo’ 120 132 110 584 4 830 1,765.8 2.1 Gadaleta et al. (2009)
‘Latino’ × ‘Primadur’ 121 96 22 322 440 1,066.2 2.4 Blanco et al. (2011, 2012)
‘Messapia’ × ‘MG4343’ 65 84 356 440 2,913.2 6.6 Blanco et al. (2004)

aRFLP, TRAP, biochemical and morphological markers