Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 4;107(9):1467–1473. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.400

Table 3a. Pathological results, with upgrading and upstaging rates highlighted, from radical prostatectomy for patients suitable for the Toronto AS criteria.

  Total (Toronto) Cambridge Melbourne Vancouver P
n 800 280 248 272  
Pathological GS          
  ⩽ 6 395 (47.8%) 157 (56%) 94 (38%) 144 (53%) <0.001
Upgrading  7 389 (48.6%) 117 (42%) 151 (61%) 121 (44%)  
   3+4 340 (87.4%) 108 (92%) 133 (88%) 99 (82%) 0.049
   4+3 49 (12.6%) 9 (8%) 18 (12%) 22 (18%)  
  8–10 16 (2%) 6 (2%) 3 (1%) 7 (3%)  
           
pT          
  pT2 659 (82.4%) 205 (73%) 216 (87%) 238 (88%) <0.001
           
Upstaging          
  pT3/4 141 (17.6%) 75 (27%) 32 (13%) 34 (12%)  
   EPE 136 (17%) 73 (26%) 30 (12%) 32 (12%)  
   SVI 8 (1%) 2 (1%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%)  
           
Margins          
 Negative 675 (84.4%) 239 (85%) 217 (88%) 219 (81%) 0.077
 Positive 125 (15.6%) 41 (15%) 31 (12%) 53 (19%)  
           
Percent tumour (n=716)          
 Median 5 5 3 10 <0.001
 Range 3–15 4–10 1.5–9 5–20  
           
Final risk groupa          
 Low 362 (45.3%) 135 (48%) 91 (37%) 136 (50%) <0.001
 Intermediate 286 (35.8%) 65 (23%) 123 (50%) 98 (36%)  
 High 152 (19%) 80 (29%) 13 (13%) 38 (14%)  
           
CAPRA-S risk groups          
 0–2 629 (78.6%) 208 (77.9%) 152 (82.3%) 143 (75.3%) 0.42
 3–5 165 (20.6%) 58 (21.7%) 34 (18.2%) 44 (23.2%)  
 ⩾6 6 (0.8%) 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.5%) 3 (1.5%)