Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;53(12):2755–2766. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P030338

TABLE 3.

Correlations between parameters

Correlated Parameters Correlation Coefficient (r)
TEWL versus SCORAD 0.560**
TEWL versus SAXD peak II position 0.450**
TEWL versus FTIR scissoring bandwidth −0.735**
TEWL versus FTIR stretching 0.645**
TEWL versus total C34 CER content 0.738**
TEWL versus total CER [EO] content −0.441**
TEWL versus average CER chain length −0.528**
TEWL versus NMF −0.643**
SCORAD versus SAXD peak II position 0.164
SCORAD versus FTIR scissoring bandwidth −0.474*
SCORAD versus FTIR stretching 0.534**
SCORAD versus total C34 CER content −0.470*
SCORAD versus total CER [EO] content −0.238
SCORAD versus average CER chain length −0.265
SCORAD versus NMF −0.362*
NMF versus SAXD peak II position −0.501**
NMF versus FTIR scissoring bandwidth 0.697**
NMF versus FTIR stretching −0.778**
NMF versus total C34 CER content −0.611**
NMF versus total CER [EO] content 0.416**
NMF versus average CER chain length 0.456**

The SCORAD indicates the severity of AE and gives valid values only when AE is diagnosed. Therefore, all control subjects were excluded in these specific correlations.

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.