Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;53(12):2773–2790. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P030890

TABLE 3.

Quantitative immunostaining of macrophages and oxidation markers by plaque type

Morphology Macrophage(KP-1) ApoB-100(MB47) MDA-lysine(MDA2) OxPL (E06) IK17 Apo(a)(LPA4)
Nonprogressive intimal lesions
 AIT (n = 7) 0.08 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.3 0.02 ± 0.02 1.5 ± 0.3
 IX (n = 8) 19.4 ± 3.3 0.6 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.30 18.1 ± 5.1 5.4 ± 4.7 11.2 ± 5.9
Early progressive atherosclerotic lesions
 PIT (n = 11) 1.4 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.9 0.9 ± 0.7 3.6 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 1.5 14.3 ± 3.8
 EFA (n = 25) 10.6 ± 1.5 1.8 ± 1.1 0.5 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 1.0 8.2 ± 1.6 11.8 ± 1.4
Late progressive atherosclerotic lesions
 LFA (n = 17) 11.8 ± 2.1 1.3 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.4 7.5 ± 1.9 12.9 ± 3.1 17.1 ± 3.4
 TCFA (n = 13) 25.5 ± 3.6 3.6 ± 1.6 1.9 ± 0.6 18.0 ± 4.3 24.4 ± 4.8 31.1 ± 8.4
 Plaque rupture (n = 8) 25.9 ± 6.5 2.0 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.7 25.6 ± 5.4 31.9 ± 4.9 30.1 ± 5.9
P valuea <0.0001 0.45 0.50 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Values represent mean percentage (± SEM) positive stained area of macrophage and lipid oxidation marker within each coronary section classified by dominant lesion type.

a

ANOVA, across all plaque types.