Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;99(11):1470–1478. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8889

Table 3.

Comparisons of fetal loss and preterm labour between laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in pregnancy

Laparoscopic Open
Reference Yes No Yes No Relative risk
Fetal loss
 Corneille et al.27 0 9 3 37 0·59 (0·03, 10·45)
 Sadot et al.28 1 40 0 16 1·21 (0·05, 28·35)
 Kirshtein et al.29 1 22 1 18 0·83 (0·06, 12·35)
 McGory et al.12 31 423 88 2591 2·08 (1·40, 3·09)
 Upadhyay et al.30 0 4 0 2 0·60 (0·02, 23·07)
 Carver et al.31 2 15 0 11 3·33 (0·17, 63·51)
 Lyass et al.32 0 11 0 11 1·00 (0·02, 46·40)
 Affleck et al.33 0 19 0 18 0·95 (0·02, 45·51)
 Conron et al.34 0 12 0 9 0·77 (0·02, 35·51)
 Gurbuz and Peetz35 0 5 0 4 0·83 (0·02, 34·94)
 Curet et al.36 0 4 0 7 1·60 (0·04, 68·53)
 Pooled relative risk 1·91 (1·31, 2·77)
Preterm labour
 Corneille et al.27 1 8 5 35 0·89 (0·12, 6·71)
 Sadot et al.28 12 29 3 13 1·56 (0·51, 4·81)
 Upadhyay et al.30 1 3 0 2 1·80 (0·10, 31·52)
 Carver et al.31 2 15 0 11 3·33 (0·17, 63·51)
 Lyass et al.32 0 11 0 11 1·00 (0·02, 46·40)
 Affleck et al.33 3 16 2 16 1·42 (0·27, 7·54)
 Gurbuz and Peetz35 0 5 0 4 0·83 (0·02, 34·94)
 Pooled relative risk 1·44 (0·68, 3·06)

Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals.