Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;98(3):283–293. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-283

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The two 4-member stimulus classes hypothesized to result from class merger via common elements after training on hue–form symbolic, hue identity, and form oddity successive matching (cf. Figure 5). Solid and broken arrows denote explicitly trained and predicted emergent symbolic relations, respectively. R = red, G = green, T = triangle, H = horizontal, 1 = first ordinal position (sample stimulus), 2 = second ordinal position (comparison stimulus).