Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Apr 5;22(6):899–908. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9763-2

Table 5.

Analysis of height at diagnosis as an osteosarcoma risk factor by individual study and aggregate data compared to a simulated reference population.

Citation Percentile of height case n (%) OR* (95% CI)
Scranton et al. 1975 ≤50th 21 (48.8) 1 (ref)
51–89th 16 (37.2) 0.94 (0.49–1.81)
≥90th 6 (14.0) 1.45 (0.59–3.60)

Pui et al. 1987 ≤50th 71 (42.3) 1 (ref)
51–89th 72 (42.8) 1.25 (0.90–1.74)
≥90th 25 (14.9) 1.76 (1.12–2.78)

Unpublished case data ≤50th 69 (32.2) 1 (ref)
51–89th 98 (45.8) 1.77 (1.30–2.41)
≥90th 47 (22.0) 3.38 (2.34–4.90)

Ruza et al. 2003 ≤50th 22 (37.9) 1 (ref)
51–89th 28 (48.3) 1.56 (0.89–2.72)
≥90th 8 (13.8) 1.90 (0.85–4.28)

Unpublished case data ≤50th 14 (21.9) 1 (ref)
51–89th 33 (51.5) 2.82 (1.51–5.28)
≥90th 17 (26.6) 6.42 (3.16–13.03)

Cotterill et al. 2004 ≤50th 150 (41.2) 1 (ref)
51–89th 146 (40.1) 1.12 (0.89–1.41)
≥90th 68 (18.7) 2.45 (1.84–3.27)

Troisi et al. 2006 ≤50th 59 (37.8) 1 (ref)
51–89th 66 (42.3) 1.30 (0.91–1.84)
≥90th 31 (19.9) 2.84 (1.83–4.38)

Aggregate data§ ≤50th 406 (38.2) 1 (ref)
51–89th 456 (42.9) 1.35 (1.18–1.54)
≥90th 202 (18.9) 2.60 (2.19–3.07)
*

Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for age and gender;

from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, TN, USA;

from University Clinic of Navarra, Spain;

§

aggregate analyses were additionally adjusted for study.