Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 28;107(8):1433–1441. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.390

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for RFS.

  Univariate: Cox regression
Multivariate: Cox regression using Firth’s bias reduction
Test set no. 1 ( N =86; time to RFS available) N HR (95% CI) P -value N HR (95% CI) P -value
GGI            
 High vs low 86 9.93 (3.13–32.3) 2.12E−05 86 3.23 (1.12–10.83) 2.91E−02
AFIP            
 Intermediate vs low 86 3.84E08 (0–Inf) 3.38E−08 86 11.2 (0.87–1.6E03) 0.06
 High vs low 86 2.17E09 (0–Inf)   86 44.1 (5.23–5.8E03) 3.01E−05
275-gene            
 Poor vs good 86 12.64 (1.66–96.17) 1.43E−02      
             
             
  Univariate: logistic regression
Multivariate: logistic regression
Test set no. 2 ( N =60; time to RFS not available) N Coefficient P -value N Coefficient P -value
GGI            
 High vs low 60 0.84 1.19E−13 60 0.60 3.16E−08
AFIP            
 Intermediate vs low 60 0.29 9.17E−03 60 0.11 0.19
 High vs low 60 0.78 8.13E−11 60 0.41 5.83E−05
275-gene            
 Poor vs good 60 0.63 1.22E−09 60 0.27 7.14E−04
             
  Univariate: logistic regression
Multivariate: logistic regression
Pooled test sets ( N =146; all samples) N Coefficient P -value N Coefficient P -value
GGI            
 High vs low 146 0.63 <2.00E−16 146 0.35 1.25E−07
AFIP            
 Intermediate vs low 146 0.20 <2.00E−16 146 0.12 0.05
 High vs low 146 0.67 8.13E−11 146 0.42 1.75E−10
275-gene            
 Poor vs good 146 0.41 3.62E−10 146 0.15 2.88E−03

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; GGI=Genomic Grade Index; HR=hazard ratio; RFS=relapse-free survival.