Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for RFS.
|
Univariate: Cox regression
|
Multivariate: Cox regression using Firth’s bias reduction
|
|||||
| Test set no. 1 ( N =86; time to RFS available) | N | HR (95% CI) | P -value | N | HR (95% CI) | P -value |
| GGI | ||||||
| High vs low | 86 | 9.93 (3.13–32.3) | 2.12E−05 | 86 | 3.23 (1.12–10.83) | 2.91E−02 |
| AFIP | ||||||
| Intermediate vs low | 86 | 3.84E08 (0–Inf) | 3.38E−08 | 86 | 11.2 (0.87–1.6E03) | 0.06 |
| High vs low | 86 | 2.17E09 (0–Inf) | 86 | 44.1 (5.23–5.8E03) | 3.01E−05 | |
| 275-gene | ||||||
| Poor vs good | 86 | 12.64 (1.66–96.17) | 1.43E−02 | |||
|
Univariate: logistic regression
|
Multivariate: logistic regression
|
|||||
| Test set no. 2 ( N =60; time to RFS not available) | N | Coefficient | P -value | N | Coefficient | P -value |
| GGI | ||||||
| High vs low | 60 | 0.84 | 1.19E−13 | 60 | 0.60 | 3.16E−08 |
| AFIP | ||||||
| Intermediate vs low | 60 | 0.29 | 9.17E−03 | 60 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| High vs low | 60 | 0.78 | 8.13E−11 | 60 | 0.41 | 5.83E−05 |
| 275-gene | ||||||
| Poor vs good | 60 | 0.63 | 1.22E−09 | 60 | 0.27 | 7.14E−04 |
|
Univariate: logistic regression
|
Multivariate: logistic regression
|
|||||
| Pooled test sets ( N =146; all samples) | N | Coefficient | P -value | N | Coefficient | P -value |
| GGI | ||||||
| High vs low | 146 | 0.63 | <2.00E−16 | 146 | 0.35 | 1.25E−07 |
| AFIP | ||||||
| Intermediate vs low | 146 | 0.20 | <2.00E−16 | 146 | 0.12 | 0.05 |
| High vs low | 146 | 0.67 | 8.13E−11 | 146 | 0.42 | 1.75E−10 |
| 275-gene | ||||||
| Poor vs good | 146 | 0.41 | 3.62E−10 | 146 | 0.15 | 2.88E−03 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; GGI=Genomic Grade Index; HR=hazard ratio; RFS=relapse-free survival.