Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 3;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-56

Table 2.

Comparison of Miscanthusand other selected biomass feedstocks

Biomass Composition (% dry weight raw)
Theoretical EtOH yield (gal/dry ton feedstock)* Pretreatment condition Enzymatic hydrolysis Sugar yield **
Glu Xyl Glu Xyl Total
Miscanthus x giganteus cv. Illinois in this study
42.9
22.0
113
180°C, 10% solid loading, 35 min, logR0 3.90
60 FPU Spezyme CP plus 120 CBU Novozym 188 per gram glucan + xylan, 72 h
92
74
55.7
Corn stover [24]
36.1
21.4
100.3
210°C, 50% solid loading, 6 min, logR0 4.02
60 FPU Spezyme CP plus 120 CBU Novozym 188 per gram glucan + xylan, 72 h
61.1
87.6
40.8
Wheat straw [25]
37.8
22.8
105.6
188°C, 10% solid loading, 40 min, logR0 4.19
15 FPU celluclast plus 15 IU Novozym 188 per gram dry substrate, 72 h
91
80
52.6
Switchgrass [26]
32.2
20.3
91.5
190°C, 5% solid loading, 10 min, logR0 3.64
15 FPU cellulase per gram glucan, 72 h
N/A
73.1
N/A
Hybrid Poplar [27] 44 15 102.5 200°C, 15% solid loading, 10 min, logR0 3.94 40 FPU Spezyme CP plus 40 CBU Novozym 188 per gram glucan, 48 h 63.3 85.3 45.5

Glu-glucan, xyl-xylan, lig-lignin.

*Theoretical EtOH yields were calculated by NREL Theoretical Ethanol Yield Calculator [38].

** Sugar yields for glu and xyl were %, the totals of glu and xyl were g/100 dry weight.