Table 3.
Number (%) of Dyads or Median | |||
---|---|---|---|
Characteristics* | Traceable Partner (n=266) | Untraceable Partner (n=153) | P-value† |
Age difference between partner and client‡ | |||
Median | 3 | 4 | 0.13 |
Range | −28 to 32 | −4 to 17 | |
Interquartile range | −1 to 7 | 1 to 9 | |
Type of sexual behavior | |||
Oral | 21 (10.3) | 5 (5.4) | 0.19 |
Anal | 55 (27.0) | 39 (41.9) | 0.01 |
Vaginal | 14 (6.9) | 5 (5.4) | 0.80 |
Oral and anal | 114 (55.9) | 39 (41.9) | 0.03 |
Oral and vaginal | 0 | 5 (5.4) | |
Frequency of sexual encounters | |||
One time only | 82 (40.1) | 80 (80.8) | <0.001 |
2–5 times | 48 (33.8) | 12 (12.1) | <0.001 |
More than 5 times | 37 (26.1) | 7 (7.1) | <0.001 |
Condom utilization | |||
Never | 59 (43.7) | 12 (26.7) | 0.04 |
Inconsistent | 53 (39.3) | 25 (55.6) | 0.06 |
Always | 23 (17.8) | 8 (17.8) | 0.91 |
How partners met | |||
Online | 69 (40.6) | 31 (52.5) | 0.05 |
At school or work | 18 (10.6) | 16 (27.1) | 0.002 |
Through friend or roommate | 22 (12.9) | 3 (5.1) | 0.10 |
Unknown/couldn’t recall | 24 (14.1) | 2 (3.4) | 0.03 |
Bar or club | 18 (10.6) | 1 (1.7) | 0.03 |
Non-sexual physical venue | 8 (4.7) | 4 (6.8) | 0.54 |
Sex venue | 5 (2.9) | 2 (3.4) | 1.0 |
Phone chat line | 4 (2.4) | 0 | |
At church | 2 (1.2) | 0 |
A total of 419 dyads were examined in this study. The number of respondents with data for each item varied, reflected in column totals for each characteristic.
Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was used to compare medians. Indicator (dummy) variables were used with Pearson’s χ2 test to calculate P-values for individual categories.
Positive numbers indicate that sex partners were older than the client, and negative numbers show that the client was older than the sex partner. For dyads with traceable partners, n=211; for those with untraceable partners, n=43.