Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 12;199(4):613–622. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207079

Table 1.

Characterization of Mdv1 suppressors of the dnm1F610A allele

Mutations WT mitochondrial morphologya GFP mitochondrial punctab Interaction with Dnm1c
DNM1 mdv1Δ dnm1F610A mdv1Δ Dnm1 Dnm1F610A Dnm1 Dnm1F610A
% %
Mdv1 67 ± 7 0 ± 0 + + +
Y418C 6 ± 3 41 ± 16 + + ++ +
K430R 9 ± 8 28 ± 4 + + +
E504G 19 ± 8 32 ± 16 + + ++
D539G 9 ± 2 68 ± 11 + + ++ +
D539Y 11 ± 1 61 ± 14 + + ++ +
L540P 12 ± 5 58 ± 14 + + ++ +
S541G 8 ± 4 38 ± 12 + + ++ +
S557C 9 ± 8 45 ± 8 + + ++ +
T558I 10 ± 8 34 ± 6 + + ++ +
D576G 68 ± 17 53 ± 9 + +
D585G 45 ± 3 30 ± 8 + +
D607G 15 ± 6 31 ± 12 + + ++
a

Numbers are the mean and standard deviation of at least three independent experiments, n = 300.

b

+, GFP puncta localized to mitochondrial tubules.

c

Yeast two-hybrid assays. −, No growth on His or Ade minus medium; +, growth on His but not Ade minus medium; ++, growth on both His and Ade minus media. Growth on Ade minus medium is the more stringent indicator of protein–protein interaction.