Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 9;109(45):18559–18564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211075109

Table 2.

Mechanism combinations and associated parameter values that best fitted the measured magnitude and frequency difference data shown in Fig. 2

Mechanism combination T2-SP, ms T2-LP, ms Inline graphic, ppb Inline graphic, ppb Inline graphic, ppb Inline graphic g-ratio chi2
Inline graphic 8 ± 2 36 ± 2 −160 ± 20 50 ± 10 — 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.37
Inline graphic 8 ± 2 38 ± 2 −60 ± 20 — −140 ± 20 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.38
Inline graphic 8 ± 2 36 ± 2 −100 ± 20 20 ± 10 −100 ± 20 0.7 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.25

The quoted error is the step length of the fitting algorithm. Also shown is the reduced chi-squared residual for each fit. If the residual was higher than 1.14 (P < 0.05), the fit was deemed unsuccessful.