Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2012 Jun 16;49(5):1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022

Table 4.

Neuropsychological tests of working memory and reasoning.

Cognitive Function Cognitive
Measure
L DLPFC R DLPFC Focal
NonDLPFC
NO
LESION
Kruskal-
Wallis χ2
Kruskal-
Wallisp value
Significant betweengroup
differences
Maintenance Digit Span Forward 6.00 (1.41) 5.89 (1.05) 6.40 (1.19) 6.68 (1.22) 4.83 0.19 none
Maintenance Spatial Span Forward 8.57 (2.94) 9.11 (3.89) 9.89 (2.56) 10.22 (2.7) 3.05 0.39 none
Monitoring: No Cognitive Load Zero-Back Errors 1.00 (0.71) 2.56 (3.47) 1.16 (1.89) 1.08 (2.33) 3.09 0.38 none
Monitoring: Low Cognitive Load One-Back Errors 3.40 (2.97) 3.67 (3.24) 3.00 (2.75) 2.57 (2.48) 1.26 0.74 none
Monitoring: Medium Cognitive Load Two-Back Errors 5.20 (1.92) 4.89 (2.37) 5.26 (2.81) 3.85 (2.39) 6.66 0.08 Focal NonDLPFC > NO LESION*
Monitoring: High Cognitive Load Three-Back Errors 6.00 (2.74) 5.67 (3.61) 6.42 (2.65) 4.68(2.40) 5.27 0.15 Focal NonDLPFC > NO LESION**
Manipulation Letter-Number Sequencing 8.14 (2.91) 9.44 (3.68) 9.95 (2.95) 11.04 (2.66) 7.73 0.05 L DLPFC < NO LESION**
Manipulation Digit Span Backward 4.14 (1.22) 4.67 (1.41) 4.75 (1.21) 4.96 (1.41) 2.49 0.48 none
Manipulation Spatial Span Backward 8.86 (3.81) 11.33 (2.96) 11.28 (2.49) 12.02 (3.12) 6.02 0.11 L DLPFC < NO LESION*
L DLPFC < Focal NonDLPFC*
Reasoning Arithmetic 8.71 (3.82) 8.22 (3.11) 10.40 (2.30) 11.00 (2.25) 8.70 0.03 R DLPFC < NO LESION**
Reasoning Matrix Reasoning 10.57 (3.78) 9.44 (2.79) 11.89 (2.47) 12.28 (2.94) 7.94 0.04 R DLPFC < NO LESION**
R DLPFC < Focal NonDLPFC*

Means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. Because the assumptions of parametric statistics were not satisfied (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Fig. 1 – 22), non-parametric statistics were used to test for group effects and for the pairwise comparisons. Significant between-group differences were determined with the Mann-Whitney U Test. Neuroscience evidence supporting the involvement of the dlPFC in working memory motivated the assessment of between-group differences when the Kruskal-Wallis test did not reach significance (see Introduction).

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.