Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 15;74(5):762–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04268.x

Table 2.

Pre- and postgraduate geriatric pharmacology education, sorted by health professional

Study Country Health professional Course description Quantitative description Type of teaching In curriculum Evaluation Level of evaluation* Strength of findings
Undergraduate
Estus et al. (2010) [52, 53] USA Pharm students (pharmD) Geriatric pharmacotherapy 120 h (3 CH) Facebook, ‘adopt a patient’, patient cases, book and film clubs, lectures, scientific and reflective writing Yes Elective Students' (n = 28) satisfaction on Facebook use: 93% valuable. Students' (n = 92) satisfaction on other teaching methods: 3.8–4.7 out of maximum 5 points 1 1
Jaedhe (2009) [54] Germany Pharm students Individual pharmacotherapy, 1/6 topics geriatric patients 5 h for 6 topics Lectures Yes Both ?
Divine & Cain (2009) [55] USA Pharm students Polypharmacy adherence as part of geriatric course Total course 120 h (3 CH) Polypharmacy medication simulation project, reflective assignment Yes Elective Qualitative research on students' satisfaction (n = 173, response rate 100%): 83% positive comments on education on open-ended questions 1 1
Ross et al. (2006) [56] USA Pharm students Vertical integrated course. 68 topics of which Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease 80 h for 68 topics Small groups Yes Mandatory ?
Sauer (2006) [24] USA Pharm students Pharmacy practice experience in ambulatory care, topic geriatrics 6 weeks, half time Rotations Yes Mandatory Qualitative research using portfolio essays: 107 of 117 portfolios studied, essay pre-experience and postexperience. Students' attitudes towards elderly improved 2a 4
Lam (2005) [57] USA Pharm students Geriatric clerkship 160 h Clerkship Yes Elective Students n = 24. 65% of written advices to prescribers was adopted by prescriber 4b 1
Bratt (2003) [58] UK Pharm students CNS pharmacology, 1 topic: Alzheimer's disease 10 h Integrated, hybrid lecture and PBL containing lectures, seminars and self study Yes Mandatory Of 104 students, 51.4% preferred traditional lectures to the PBL; 54.2% PBL did aid knowledge retention. Mature students (44%) vs. younger students (25.8%) preferred PBL over traditional lectures (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U rank sum test) 1 1
Strohkirch & Jaehde (2003) [59] Germany Pharm students clinical pharmacology. Topics: geriatrics, renal failure, medication review ? Lectures, workshops, bedside teaching, practice simulation Yes Elective ?
George & Jacobs (2011) [60] USA Medical students, residents and fellows Geriatric pharmacotherapy 23 times, 1 h sessions Seminars using the Medication Screening Questionnaire Yes ? Qualitative evaluation of education. 163 of 241 participants. 99% (strongly) agreed that overall quality of the sessions was excellent. All (strongly) agreed on meeting learning goals 1 1
Naritoku & Faingold (2009) [61] USA Medical students Pharmacotherapeutics, 1 topic, Alzheimer's disease 1 h (Interactive) lectures Yes Mandatory n = 39, response rate 64%. Students' satisfaction on Alzheimer's topic: 4.7 ± 0.61 (out of 5) 1 1
Franson et al. (2008) [22] Netherlands Medical students Pharmacology, 1 topic geriatrics Average time 1–2 h e-Learning Yes Mandatory 1100 students, >175 000 hits. Time spent on the program was associated with grades on topic: regression equation grade = 5.02 + 0.034 × time spent on program 2b 3
Dubois et al. (2007) [23] Netherlands Medical students Geriatric pharmacotherapy ? Therapeutic plan writing and self-study computer materials Yes Both Cohort 1999 vs. cohort 2000 with intervention: percentage of students with sufficient result on therapeutic plan writing in intervention cohort improved compared with pre-intervention cohort (31% vs 69% two-sample t-test, P < 0.05) 2b 4
Smith et al. (2006) [62] Australia Medical students Polypharmacy as part of rational prescribing course 12 modules e-Learning Yes ? In total, 363 students on online survey (response rate 6–13% in different years): 91–92% content module appropriate, 78–86% felt equipped to prescribe 1 1
Eroglu & Uresin (2003) [63] Turkey Medical students Pharmacology education, geriatrics 1 of 17 subjects 24 h for all 17 subjects PBL Yes Mandatory ?
Herzig et al. (2003) [64]; Antepohl & Herzig (1999) [65] Canada Medical students Pharmacology course, 1 topic Parkinson's disease 3 h per topic Problem based learning vs Lecture based learning No Pretest, post-test, post-test after 18 months showed no differences in the PBL group (n = 17/55, mean score on final test 20.1 ± 5.0) vs. the lecture-based learning group (n = 15/57, mean score on final test 19.0 ± 4.7) on pharmacology knowledge. 80 students were lost to follow-up for the final post-test 2b 1
Faingold & Dunaway (2002) [66] USA Medical students CNS. Topics: Parkinson's disease, dementia 1.5 h for both topics together Integrated lectures, small groups Yes Mandatory ?
Lathers & Smith (2002) [67] USA Medical students, residents Geriatric clinical pharmacology 2 h ‘Clinical pharmacology problem-solving unit’. Case-based learning Yes ? Of 455 students and residents, 40% (range in different years 25–65%) found it useful for learning 1 1
Lim & Honey (2006) [68] New Zealand Nursing students Elderly pharmacokinetics ? Integrated, PBL Yes Mandatory ?
Postgraduate
Leikola et al. (2009) [69] Finland Pharmacists Comprehensive medication review, rational prescribing, clinical pharmacology 935 h (35 ECTS) Seminars, e-learning, learning in practice Yes Elective Online evaluation (n = 38, response rate 90%): 92% met educational needs, 95% would recommend training to peers 1 1
Demirkan et al. (2004) [35] Turkey Pharmacists Good practice pharmacists, 1 topic: group at risk (geriatric, renal and liver failure) 7 h Lectures, workshops Yes Elective 95 pharmacists participated: score on pretest vs. post-test on all topics: 36.1 ± 7.9 vs. 56.6 ± 10.3 2b 3
Strohkirch & Jaehde (2003) [59] Germany Pharmacists Clinical pharmacology 1 year, 4 modules at university Practice in own work environment, online support Yes Elective ?
Warshaw et al. (2010) [70] USA GP Medication management as part of geriatric education 1.25 h medication management Presentations Yes ? 60 GPs: response rate 80–93% (over different years). Score 3.8 out of 4 on presentation content, quality and meeting educational needs 1 1
Midlöv et al. (2006) [31] Sweden GP Psychoactive drugs 2 visits Outreach visits No Decrease in benzodiazepine prescribing after 9 months in intervention group (n = 23) compared with control group (n = 31) (P < 0.05). GP's satisfaction: median 8–10 out of 10 on 6 subjects 1,4b 4
Straand et al. (2006) [71] Norway GP Pharmacotherapeutics 2 visits, 8 h workshop Outreach visits, workshops, feedback reports No ?
Pimlott et al. (2003) [32] Canada GP Benzodiazepine use in elderly 3 times in 6 months Educational bulletins, feedback on prescriptions No Randomisation of physicians. Intervention (n = 168) vs. control group (n = 206): 0.7% decrease vs. 1.1% increase in long-acting benzodiazepine (P = 0.036, not clinically relevant), no other significant differences 4b 3
Lutters et al. (2004) [72] Switzerland Hospital physicians Antibiotics prescriptions in elderly Weekly ward rounds Ward rounds with infectious disease specialist, lectures, individual counselling, pocket cards Yes Mandatory Interventional cohort study (before, during and after intervention): 680 patients receiving antibiotics included: 15% reduction in proportion of patients receiving antibiotics (P = 0.08), 26% reduction in number of antibiotics administered (P < 0.001). In 83 of 110 patients, guidelines correctly implemented 4b 2
George & Jacobs (2011) [60] USA Residents and fellows, medical students Geriatric pharmacotherapy 23 times, 1 h sessions Seminars using the Medication Screening Questionnaire Yes ? Qualitative evaluation of education. 163 of 241 participants. 99% (strongly) agreed that overall quality of the sessions was excellent. All (strongly) agreed on meeting learning goals 1 1
Naughton et al. (2010) [33] USA Internal medicine residents Polypharmacy training as part of NSAID prescribing training 7 monthly modules Patient chart review, lectures Yes Mandatory 35 postgraduate internal medicine residents. Pre-intervention vs. postintervention: reduction in NSAID prescribing after 1 year: 29 vs. 16% (P = 0.002) reduction in NSAID and 14 vs. 7% reduction in NSAID in conjunction with a diuretic (P = 0.024) 4b 3
Baum & Harder (2010) [34] Germany Residents, senior physicians Renal failure adjustments 2 h Lecture Yes ? 8 physicians. 2 patient cohorts: pre-education (n = 85) vs. posteducation (n = 85). Cohort 1, 55 of 85 misdosing vs. cohort 2, 28 of 85 misdosing at day 2 of hospital admission (P = 0.05) 4b 3
Montagnini et al. (2004) [73] USA Internal medicine residents Geriatric and palliation rotation One month rotation. Amount of hours on pharmacology education unclear. Lectures, bedside teaching, conferences, practice-based learning Yes Mandatory 28 residents completed the evaluation forms (prerotation and postrotation). On palliation topics (including delirium), residents self-assessments increased from 2.89–3.71 to 4.10–4.67 (out of 5). P < 0.00001 2b 2
Lathers & Smith (2002) [67] USA Residents (medical, psychiatry), medical studdents Geriatric clinical psychopharmacology 2 h ‘Clinical pharmacology problem-solving unit’. Case-based learning Yes ? Of 455 students and residents, 40% (range in different years 25–65%) found it useful for learning 1 1
Meagher (2010) [74] UK Healthcare workers Pharmacotherapy in delirium 2 h Workshop No Congress workshop. n = 66 (response rate unknown). Pre-education vs. posteducation on rating adverse events: concerns regarding extrapyramidal side effects reduced (52 vs. 21%; P < 0.001). Posteducation survey on future pharmacotherapy: positive attitude regarding prophylaxis in high-risk patients: 56% respondents. 2a 1

Abbreviations: CH, credit hour; CNS, central nervous system; ECTS, European Credit Transfer System; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; GP, General Practitioner; PBL, problem-based learning; and Pharm students, pharmacy students.

*

Modified level of evaluation of Kirkpatrick.

Strength of findings after critical appraisal.